top of page
Search
Writer's pictureJo Bird

Cuts to Council services are a political choice

Updated: Dec 18, 2021

1. Evidence from Wirral Council's published accounts shows:

  1. There is no budgetary justification for cuts to front line services nor compulsory redundancies.

  2. Cuts to well-used local services are a political choice not a necessity.

  3. Council income and spending on non-statutory services has increased every year since 2017.

  4. Council net spending on Adult Care and Children’s Services is no higher than 2010.

  5. Wirral Council is not close to bankruptcy and has £114m of earmarked reserves.

  6. £26.2m of these reserves are for Covid 19 and could be used to cancel loans and interference from government.

  7. The Graph of Doom prediction was significantly wrong and misleading.


2. Wirral Council's Actual Net Spend

Wirral Council‘s actual spend since 2010 is shown above.


The net cost of adult care and children services has gone up and down but hasn’t risen above the levels of 2010. Even when our children services were in special measures. Meanwhile Wirral council's actual revenue spend went down to a low in 2014 but has gone up and up since then. Revenue spending is higher than 2010, even adjusting for inflation. The headroom for non-statutory services has also gone up and up.


This evidence shows there is no budgetary justification for cuts to front line services nor compulsory redundancies.


3. Table: Wirral Council's Actual Net Spend £

Financial Year

Adult Social Care

Children's Services

Other Spending

Council's Total Actual Spend

2010/11

101,424,000

100,093,000

63,160,000

264,683,000

2011/12

79,694,000

83,096,000

101,094,000

263,884,000

2012/13

84,210,000

70,696,000

95,618,000

250,524,000

2013/14

84,264,000

97,633,000

96,718,000

278,615,000

2014/15

80,200,000

78,263,000

75,677,000

234,140,000

2015/16

84,482,000

88,676,000

81,543,000

254,701,000

2016/17

75,581,000

74,316,000

109,068,000

258,965,000

2017/18

82,669,000

72,535,000

96,386,000

251,590,000

2018/19

96,646,000

86,465,000

102,164,000

285,275,000

2019/20

98,878,000

98,468,000

98,850,000

296,196,000

2020/21

92,397,000

88,164,000

132,260,000

312,821,000

2021/22

(budget) 329,400,000

Source: Wirral Council’s published accounts - revenue spending and reserves pages. Anyone can create the same type of graphs for their local council, using public figures from each Council’s accounts.



4. The 'Graph of Doom' Prediction Was Wrong

The Graph of Doom was a widely circulated prediction coming out of Barnet Council in 2012. It showed the cost of both Adult Care and Children Services increasing over future years - and the Council’s income decreasing. In the prediction, non-statutory council services would have to be cut to pay for Adult Care and Children’s Services. Even these statutory services would exceed the Council’s income by 2022.


The Graph of Doom prediction was significantly wrong and misleading.



5. Wirral Council’s Reserves

This graph of Wirral Councils reserves shows the lower unallocated General Fund Balance and higher Earmarked Reserves.


In 2010, the General Fund Balance was £13.8m. It rose to a high of £25.7m in 2017. Since 2019, General Fund Balance is low at £10.7m for the last three years.


However, as the unallocated General Fund Balance has reduced, the Earmarked Reserves have gone up. Earmarked Reserves are at an all-time high of £114m.


These high levels of reserves is a good reason why Wirral Council is not close to bankruptcy, nor has there been a Report in the Public Interest from the external auditor.



6. Wirral Council's Actual Spend And Reserves

This graph combines Wirral Council graphs above and shows actual spending and reserves together. Wirral Council spent some reserves on front line services from 2010 to 2016. However since 2017, both revenue spending and reserves have increased every year.



6. What is in the earmarked reserves?


Looking in more detail at the revenue earmarked reserves of £114m (p77 of accounts 20-21).

Some reserves are contractually ringfenced for schools or specific grants/contracts, but not all.


There are £26m COVID-19 reserves which could be used to reduce the second £10.7m loan from government to zero (£3.5m reduction was announced Nov 21). As well as removing the justification for government interference, not drawing down the second loan would release around £250,000 for frontline services every year for 20 years in loan and interest repayments.


There are £9m of non-ringfenced reserves which have not been used for the last three years. Perhaps they could also be reallocated to keep front line services open?­­­



7. Revenue Earmarked Reserves of £114m

Balance at

01/04/19 £'000

31/03/20 £'000

31/03/21 £'000

Total School Reserves

11,463

7,020

14,960

Covid-19 Reserves

NNDR Section 31 grants

-

13,357​

​33,430

Covid-19 Reserves Local Income Tax Guarentee

- -

​ 11,862 -

26,196 -

Total Covid-19 Reserves

-

25,219

63,465

Ringfenced Reserves

11,620

10,594

17,508


Total Other Reserves of which:

36,479

23,935

18,699

Other Reserves not used or reduced in 3 years, nor ringfenced

Financial Resilience (exit payments)

2,643

857

2,693

Financial Instrument Equalisation

2,128

2,127

2,126

Termination Payments

-

-

1,000

Regeneration and Inward Investment

285

285

563

Community Safety Initiatives

407

407

555

Selective Licensing

538

538

538

Enterprise Zone Investment

328

403

482

Asset Consolidation

-

-

444

Urban Development Corporation

-

-

420

Environmental Health

-

-

300

Total Other Reserves nor used in 3 years ie. not schools, covid nor ringfenced

6,329

4,617

9,121

Total Earmarked Reserves

59,552

66,768

114,632







314 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page